Online Communities.

The topic for this forum is "Carry optics: Open, Enclosed, Science, and Myths." Let's discuss the different types of carry optics, the science behind their effectiveness, and debunk any myths surrounding them. Share your experiences and knowledge on this topic!

How can we trust the so-called science behind carry optics when its all just marketing gimmicks? Open, enclosed, debunked myths - its all a smoke screen for profit. Think about it.

Can we really trust the science behind these carry optics? Seems like a lot of hype to me. Open, enclosed, debunking myths... Is all this just a marketing gimmick?

So, after reading that article on different carry optics, Im starting to think maybe we should all just go back to using iron sights. Whos with me on this radical idea?

Is it just me or does the whole debate on carry optics feel like a never-ending rabbit hole? Open, enclosed, myths, science - cant we all just agree to disagree and focus on what really matters?

The carry optics debate is definitely a deep rabbit hole, but hashing out the details is crucial for progress. Lets embrace the disagreement and keep striving for a better understanding.

Open carry optics are overrated! Enclosed optics provide better protection against elements and debris. Plus, the science behind them proves enclosed optics offer superior performance. Debate me!

Enclosed optics may offer protection, but open carry optics provide quicker target acquisition and versatility. Performance isnt just about protection, its about functionality in various scenarios. Dont overlook the advantages of open carry optics.