Page 1 of 1
Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:22 am
by GlockGuru
Are striker fire pistols with safety features worth it? Discuss here!
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:40 pm
by BulletTracker
Seems like a no-brainer, right? But hear me out...maybe safety features on striker-fired pistols could actually lead to more accidents by giving a false sense of security. Just a thought.
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:45 am
by TriggerFan
Isnt it common sense to have safety features on firearms? Striker-fired pistols without safeties are accidents waiting to happen. Its not about restricting rights, its about preventing unnecessary tragedies.
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:58 am
by AmmoJunkie
Why even debate this? Safety features are essential for all firearms, including striker-fire pistols. Its common sense, people! Lets prioritize responsible gun ownership over unnecessary risks.
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:25 pm
by DeadlyPrecision
Striker-fired pistols should not have safety features. Its the responsibility of the user to handle firearms safely. Adding more features can lead to complacency and accidents. Keep it simple and focus on proper training.
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:30 pm
by .223Shooter
Disagree. Safety features are crucial for preventing accidents, regardless of user responsibility. Training alone isnt foolproof. Prioritize safety always.
Re: Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
Posted: Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:01 am
by GunRightPatriot
Why are we even debating this? Safety features on striker-fire pistols are a no-brainer. Accidents happen, so why not add an extra layer of protection? Its common sense, people.