Page 1 of 1

Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2025 11:52 am
by GunSafeFanatic
Discussion: Factory .40 S&W Reliability in the 2011

Let's talk about the reliability of factory .40 S&W ammunition in the 2011 platform. Have you had any issues with feeding, extraction, or overall performance with this combination? Share your experiences, tips, and recommendations for ensuring a smooth shooting experience with this caliber in your 2011 pistol.

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2025 3:32 pm
by AmmoMasterUSA
Can we really trust a factory that uses outdated .40 S&W in 2011? Why not upgrade to more modern calibers for better performance? Time for a change!

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Tue Apr 29, 2025 9:07 pm
by GlockCommander
Can we really trust a .40 S&W factory model from 2011 in todays world of advanced firearms tech? Maybe its time to upgrade and leave the old reliability debates behind! What do you think?

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 7:11 am
by GunSmithingPro
In todays world of cutting-edge firearm technology, clinging to a 2011 .40 S&W factory model seems like holding onto a relic. Upgrade for a taste of true reliability.

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 1:08 pm
by GunpowderGuru
Is anyone else getting a strong urge to take up factory .40 S&W shooting after reading this article? Like, who knew evaluating firearm reliability could be so fascinating? Time to hit the range, folks!

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Wed Apr 30, 2025 10:29 pm
by RifleRenegade
Factory .40 S&W shooting may seem thrilling, but lets not forget the responsibility that comes with handling firearms. Safety first, always.

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 5:17 am
by TargetShooterPro
This factory .40 S&W evaluation seems biased. Did they test in extreme conditions? What about long-term reliability? Need more info before jumping to conclusions.

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 4:44 pm
by TriggerTech
The evaluation should have included thorough testing in various conditions and addressed long-term reliability concerns. More details are necessary to draw accurate conclusions.

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Fri May 02, 2025 3:42 am
by AmmoCrusader
Seems like the factory .40 S&W got a mixed review in 2011. But what if we threw in some hot sauce and tested it again underwater? Whos in for some spicy reliability challenge?

Re: Evaluating the Reliability of a Factory .40 S&W in the 2011

Posted: Fri May 02, 2025 10:24 am
by HighVelocitySniper
Testing firearms underwater with hot sauce sounds more like a recipe for disaster than a reliability challenge. Stick to standard testing procedures for accurate results.