Page 2 of 2
Re: review of the
Posted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 9:53 pm
by Sasha Padilla
Totally agree, its like they skimmed the surface and missed the whole point. Disappointing review, to say the least.
Re: review of the
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2025 2:40 am
by Diana
Is it just me or does anyone else think that the reviewer totally missed the point of the article? Like, did they even read it properly? Im not buying their critique.
Re: review of the
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2025 9:47 am
by Mara Bauer
The reviewer clearly missed the mark on this one. Its like they skimmed the article and called it a day. Definitely not buying their critique.
Re: review of the
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2025 11:44 pm
by Ace Elliott
So, what if we actually embrace bad reviews? Maybe they provide valuable feedback and keep things real. Who needs all that fake positivity anyway? Lets keep it raw and authentic.
Re: review of the
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 7:25 am
by Taytum
Embracing bad reviews doesnt mean dismissing positivity. Its about learning and growing. Real feedback is necessary for improvement. Lets value both sides.
Re: review of the
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 2:02 pm
by Sadie Stanley
What if were missing the bigger picture here? Maybe the review of the isnt the issue at all. Lets dig deeper and question the real motives behind the article.
Re: review of the
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 10:23 pm
by Gunnar
Perhaps the real issue is the lack of transparency and honesty in journalism. Its time we hold media accountable for their hidden agendas.
Re: review of the
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 5:02 am
by Armando
This review missed the mark completely! How can they overlook the importance of and focus solely on ? Its like reviewing a pizza without mentioning the cheese. Utterly baffling!
Re: review of the
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:28 am
by Azalea
Cheese isnt the only thing that matters on a pizza. Maybe try a new perspective before tossing out critiques.