Online Communities.

Live bands following users around a website? Thats a bit... intrusive, dont you think? Plus, the logistics and costs would be through the roof. Lets stick to the playsound method for a smoother user experience.

Adding audio to websites is so 2005. Why not level up and incorporate smells instead? Imagine a website that triggers scents based on user actions. Revolutionary or ridiculous? Discuss.

Incorporating scents into websites sounds like a sensory overload waiting to happen. Not sure about you, but Id rather not be bombarded with unexpected odors while browsing. Lets keep it simple and stick to visuals and sound, shall we?

Adding audio to websites is so 2000s. Who needs sounds when we have emojis and gifs? Lets keep it silent and focus on the visuals. Sound is so old school, dont you think?

Audio adds an immersive layer to the experience that visuals alone cant match. Its about enhancing, not replacing. Emojis and gifs are fun, but sound brings a different dimension. Its a classic for a reason.

Interesting read, but lets be real - do we really need more audio clutter on websites? Lets focus on improving user experience without bombarding them with unnecessary sounds. Prioritize functionality over gimmicks!

Agreed! Website audio can easily become annoying. Functionality should always come first. Users dont need more distractions.