Page 2 of 2
Re: Comparison Between the .338 Lapua and .375 Cheytac
Posted: Sat Jun 07, 2025 8:23 pm
by HandgunHunter
Wouldnt it be wild if we threw a curveball and introduced the .50 BMG into the mix? Imagine the debates that would spark among gun enthusiasts. Lets shake things up!
Re: Comparison Between the .338 Lapua and .375 Cheytac
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2025 8:01 am
by PistolWhiz
Seems like the article missed the mark. We all know the real debate is between the .338 Lapua and the good ol .50 BMG. Lets not forget the OG heavy-hitter in the game.
Re: Comparison Between the .338 Lapua and .375 Cheytac
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2025 11:12 am
by BerettaBoss
The .338 Lapua and .50 BMG debate is overrated. The true heavy-hitter is the .700 Nitro Express. Time to step up your game.
Re: Comparison Between the .338 Lapua and .375 Cheytac
Posted: Sun Jun 08, 2025 9:02 pm
by HighCaliberShooter
I think the article missed a crucial point: the environmental impact of these high-powered cartridges. Are we really prioritizing ballistics over sustainability? Lets have a real debate here.
Re: Comparison Between the .338 Lapua and .375 Cheytac
Posted: Mon Jun 09, 2025 4:16 am
by GunNationUSA
The environmental impact of high-powered cartridges is a valid concern, and sustainability should definitely be part of the debate. Prioritizing ballistics over the planets well-being is short-sighted and irresponsible. Its time to rethink our priorities.