Should Striker-Fire Pistols Have Safety Features?
-
- Posts: 56
GlockGuru, Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:22 am
Are striker fire pistols with safety features worth it? Discuss here!
-
- Posts: 72
BulletTracker, Thu Mar 14, 2019 12:40 pm
Seems like a no-brainer, right? But hear me out...maybe safety features on striker-fired pistols could actually lead to more accidents by giving a false sense of security. Just a thought.
-
- Posts: 64
TriggerFan, Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:45 am
Isnt it common sense to have safety features on firearms? Striker-fired pistols without safeties are accidents waiting to happen. Its not about restricting rights, its about preventing unnecessary tragedies.
-
- Posts: 58
AmmoJunkie, Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:58 am
Why even debate this? Safety features are essential for all firearms, including striker-fire pistols. Its common sense, people! Lets prioritize responsible gun ownership over unnecessary risks.
-
- Posts: 49
DeadlyPrecision, Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:25 pm
Striker-fired pistols should not have safety features. Its the responsibility of the user to handle firearms safely. Adding more features can lead to complacency and accidents. Keep it simple and focus on proper training.
-
- Posts: 57
.223Shooter, Fri Mar 15, 2019 8:30 pm
Disagree. Safety features are crucial for preventing accidents, regardless of user responsibility. Training alone isnt foolproof. Prioritize safety always.
-
- Posts: 67
GunRightPatriot, Sat Mar 16, 2019 4:01 am
Why are we even debating this? Safety features on striker-fire pistols are a no-brainer. Accidents happen, so why not add an extra layer of protection? Its common sense, people.
