Can we really trust these warnings? Maybe shooting surplus is exactly what we need to protect ourselves. Lets not blindly follow mainstream advice without questioning its validity.

AA1680 is overrated. Why do we still rely on it when there are better alternatives available? Its time to explore new options instead of sticking to the same old routine.

Honestly, the Shadow Systems MR920 seems overhyped. Why not focus on more innovative designs instead of just tweaking existing ones? Lets push boundaries, not settle for incremental changes.

Luke Volkmanns work is definitely impressive, but comparing him to Da Vinci might be a bit of a stretch. Artistic? Sure. Da Vinci level? Not quite.

Why waste money on light rail when we could invest in more efficient buses or improve existing infrastructure? Lets think outside the tracks and consider all options before making a decision.

How can we trust the results of this comparison when theres no mention of the testing methodology? Seems fishy to me. Are we just supposed to take their word for it?

Seems like a waste of time and resources. Why bother with precision when you can just buy a ready-made AR10? Lets focus on more important things.

Why bother customizing a G19 for performance when you could just buy a more powerful gun? Seems like a waste of time and money to me.

Why bother with customizing a G19 when we could just invest in improving gun control laws? Lets prioritize safety over accessories. #ControversialOpinion

Why not consider a water gun instead? Its non-lethal and perfect for summer fun. Plus, you wont have to worry about accidentally shooting yourself in the foot. Just a thought!